"Ms. Zubko-Valva provided the defendants with overwhelming, irrefutable evidence of the graphic, horrific abuse, including documentary proof, audio recordings and transcriptions, photographs and medical reports."
From lawsuit filed by Justyna, Tommy's mother Little Tommy’s mother, Justyna, filed a $200M lawsuit this week against the Family Court judge and other officials involved in her custody case, 5 months after his death at the hands of his father. Tommy’s father was enabled by three Family Court judges to severely abuse him for many years, despite Justyna fighting hard for his protection and submitting substantial evidence of physical, sexual and emotional abuse. But, as usual in contested custody cases, the judges deemed his mother a liar and restricted her to supervised visitation, giving the father complete power and control to use and abuse his son at will. Unfortunately, the media is failing to put Little Tommy’s death into the context of systemic sexism operating in family courts, and some outlets are spreading false narratives, which harm the movement. It is important to ask MSM to print the truth about Tommy and the Custody Crisis [see below]. One local New York outlet, Newsday, quotes the mother’s attorney, saying the judge “failed to review evidence” and that the father was given custody because he was a police officer. In fact, there were three judges who DISREGARDED substantial evidence in Tommy’s case, not “failed to review it”. This is an important distinction in getting to the crux of the matter: Family court judges are not just negligent or untrained, they are deliberately ignoring damaging evidence about fathers and fabricating damaging evidence about mothers to justify switching custody to the father. And Tommy's father may have been a police officer, but this is an exception to the rule of most fathers getting custody regardless of occupation. Reporting only that position misleads the public into thinking it is rare for abusive fathers to be given custody. Research shows that judges are switching custody from primary nurturing mothers to fathers in approximately 82% of cases, with 70% involving abusive fathers; and that women have never had the power to keep custody after divorce, thanks to discriminatory systems men put in place as soon as women gained the power to live independently of them. Research also confirms it is in children’s best interest to live primarily with their primary attachment figure after divorce (and visit the other parent regularly), especially when the parents do not get along; and, of course, to restrict visitation with abusive parents. This research and the fact that THREE judges in this one case, and thousands of other judges around the world are empowering fathers at the expense of women and children, support that it is entrenched, systemic male entitlement causing women to lose custody. The incredible devastation caused to millions of women’s and children’s lives around the world is incalculable. As a result of this case, legislation for cameras in the courtroom and on court-affiliated officials are being promoted as a solution. It is unclear this solution is being proposed when judges ignored “mountains of evidence and can simply ignore video evidence as well. The problem, said best by law professor Wendy Murphy, is “Family Court judges can do whatever the hell they want.” And what they want, in way too many cases, it to entitle and empower fathers, regardless of the harm it causes women and children. What is needed is not band-aid reforms like cameras, more training or more child abuse laws, but profound structural change: a new system that removes custody cases from Family Court. Want to help get the truth out? ASK THE MEDIA to report on the real cause of Tommy’s death: the Custody Crisis. [You can refer them to The Women’s Coalition for more information and interviews with a link to this post.] Nicole Fuller: [email protected] [If you know of any other reporters who may report on the crisis, please have them contact TWC and link them to this post or on FB: ] NOTE: If anyone knows how to contact with Justyna, please tell her the real reason she lost custody was systemic sexism, not negligence or lack of video evidence, and have her contact TWC for more info and support from women from around the world. The Women's Coalition: https://www.womenscoalitioninternational.org Join your local coalition to help raise awareness about the crisis and fight for change: [email protected] Previous TWC article: https://www.womenscoalitioninternational.org/news/boy-placed-in-custody-of-father-dies-from-horrific-abuse Previous TWC post: https://www.facebook.com/TheWomensCoalition/photos/a.1464723457135309/2578889842385326/ Newsday article: Thomas Valva's mother files $200 million lawsuit in 8-year-old's death https://www.newsday.com/long-island/thomas-valva-death-lawsuit-1.45793106
5 Comments
Malvina Fernandez-Lopez [Martin}
6/21/2020 04:46:48 pm
I agree whole heartedly and 1000%. I had at least SIX [6] judges including one that was having sex with his court clerk and the one that replaced him disqualified himself came back two [2] months later and "un-disqualified" him. Court clerks, attorneys, visitation monitors, and police all in it together. Never got my sons back. After the oldest was 18 1/2 living with the abuser, his father was "starving" him and would not let him eat while him and his drug addict whore, and my other 17 year old son ate. My sons had nowhere to go, our home was sold through real estate fraud in 2014 which I am still homeless and they are still with him. At 19 1/2 years old, my oldest called 911 to report DV against his father and the same drug addict whore. No arrests, because my son gave his father an ultimatum to be arrested or throw the drug addict out. He and his younger brother are still with there father, he's 21, and my youngest will be 20 soon. It's about MONEY, trafficking the child[ren] for financial gain, everyone gets $$$ somewhere along the way. It's also about power, control, and abuse.
Reply
5/25/2022 08:30:07 am
Family court judges are not just negligent or untrained, I’m so thankful for your helpful post!
Reply
5/25/2022 10:22:21 am
Family court judges are not just negligent or untrained, I’m so thankful for your helpful post!
Reply
6/1/2023 01:23:48 am
Thanks for your post.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCindy Dumas, M.A. has been researching, writing, and raising awareness about the Custody Crisis since 2003, when she was unable to protect her children from their abusive father. She fled into hiding when Family Court failed her and was tricked into returning home, when her children were given to their abusive father. Archives
January 2022
Categories |